Accepted for What?

When the gospel was first preached Peter concluded that Jesus of Nazareth was both “Lord and Christ.” The Greek word for Lord could just as easily be translated master. How often do you think of Jesus as your Master?

When the New Testament was written, the word ‘lord’ was often used as a sign of respect, similar to the way we use the word ‘sir.’ Yet, the followers of Jesus undoubtedly intended more than ‘sir’ when they called Him, “Lord.” They considered Jesus to be their Master.

The Apostle Paul referred to himself and his missionary companions as bond-servants of Jesus. Paul called Timothy a bond-servant of Christ and applied it forward to all who teach and preach. In their letters, James, Peter, and Jude all introduced themselves as bond-servants of Jesus. In the book of Revelation not only does John regard himself a bond-servant of Jesus, but also Moses and God’s angels. In fact, all saints are considered bond-servants of Christ. The bond-servant exchanges his will for the will of the Master. The servant’s single aim is to glorify his Master by doing His will.

The unglorified position of the slave was the focus of last week’s article. Jesus described a slave that served his Master without thanks, without an expected reward. He received only the acceptance of his Master.

In the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30) slaves are shown in a different light. A master puts three of his servants in charge of a large sum of money, each given an amount appropriate to their ability. As is true of all slaves, they were expected to carry out their master’s will. In the parable, the will of the master is not stated explicitly. Yet, it is clear that they were each expected to put the money to use to make more money for the master.

In the parable, Jesus revealed how the slaves handled their assignments. Two of the slaves did according to the master’s will. They put the money to use and gained more money for their master. And what did they receive?

The master returned to settle accounts with the slaves. The first slave was entrusted with five talents (a very large sum of money), and he gained five more for the master. (Notice that it was for the master, not himself. He did not receive a percentage of the profits, a commission, or even a bonus. He did not even receive thanks.) The master then said, “Well done, good and faithful slave.” Though not a word of gratitude, it was genuine acceptance.

The slave who was entrusted with one talent was afraid and hid the money so that he could return it to his master upon his return. It is true that nothing was lost, but nothing was gained. The master expected gain. So, his words to this slave were strong: “You wicked, lazy slave!”

Three things then happened:

• The man with one talent had his talent taken away. (It was not his money to begin with.)
• The man with one talent was rejected and cast away from the master.
• The man with ten talents was given the talent from the unfaithful slave. (None of the money was his; not the original five, not the profit of five, and not the one from the unfaithful slave.)

The master approved of the man with ten talents and gave him one more talent, that is, more responsibility. (What were you expecting?!)

The master did say something more to the two faithful slaves. He invited them: “Enter into the joy of your master.”

When we learn that the only thing that matters is to glorify and please our Master, we will understand the treasure of entering the joy of our Master.

Mark Stinnett

July 19, 2026

No Thanks

We love stories that revolve around someone who is underappreciated and then makes a comeback. A charming and generous but underappreciated man falls on hard times and is on the brink of suicide. Just in the nick of time his family and friends come to support him. Happy ending; all is well. An underappreciated lawman or doctor or coach or civic leader comes to a point of exhaustion, ready to give in, ready to give up. Then they dig deep within and try a little harder, just one more day. Circumstances change and they are rewarded for their inner strength and tenacity.

Not all stories of the underappreciated turn out so well. The underappreciated butler endures the ungrateful family he serves and in retaliation carefully launches a plan to steal the family’s wealth. The underappreciated policeman or government worker devotes a lifetime of service, but in the end lashes out violently against the system that has undervalued him.

There is within all of us a sense of justice or fairness. It comes from a belief that there should be balance in life. If a crime is committed, the criminal should be punished in a way that balances with (fits) the crime. (The Old Testament law of “an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth” follows that kind of reasoning.)

When a person goes to work, he ought to be paid a fair wage. When a product is sold, it ought to be for a fair price. When you do a favor for a friend, he promises, “I owe you one,” a verbal gesture for a future equitable favor.

Of course, there are occasions in which we do not expect the favor to be returned. When a parent does something for his/her child fair payment is not expected. And yet, a parent can feel underappreciated when there is no thanks. Most of us expect appreciation, if in no other way, then by simple, heartfelt gratitude. And yet, Jesus told of a time when a person would not be shown gratitude?

“Which of you, having a slave plowing or tending sheep, will say to him when he has come in from the field, ‘Come immediately and sit down to eat’? But will he not say to him, ‘Prepare something for me to eat, and properly clothe yourself and serve me while I eat and drink; and afterward you may eat and drink’? He does not thank the slave because he did the things which were commanded, does he? So you too, when you do all the things which are commanded you, say, ‘We are unworthy slaves; we have done only that which we ought to have done.’ ” 

—Luke 17:7-10

Does this teaching seem odd to you?

Are you disappointed with its ending?

The master was not expected to give thanks to the servant because the slave was there to serve the master. When the slave did as the slave was expected he was accepted because all expectations were met. Yet, the slave receive no thanks, no bonus, no reward. Still yet, there were no inequities. Neither owed the other.

Jesus did not leave this teaching open to interpretation. He revealed the application to all who listened/read: We who are servants of Jesus ought to see ourselves as unworthy slaves. Our task is to fulfill our Master’s will. We may find satisfaction in knowing that we have done our Master’s will and received His acceptance.

We might not know what motivated this teaching. But it is especially applicable to those who whine and complain when they don’t receive attention for the service they offer in the Lord.

As a humble servant, give all glory to the Master.

Mark Stinnett

July 12, 2026

Man's Plans and Casting Lots

For many Bible readers, the Old Testament practice of ‘casting lots’ seems like the use of chance in making decisions. Bible dictionaries suggest that ’lots’ might have been sticks of various lengths, flat stones, or even some kind of ancient dice. Such descriptions resemble today’s ’drawing straws,’ ‘flipping coins’ and ‘rolling dice,’ all ways of deciding by chance. And yet...

The lot is cast into the lap,

But its every decision is from the Lord.

--Proverbs 16:33

What are we supposed to do with this proverb?

Here are a few Bible examples of casting lots to make decisions:

• Lots were cast to select one of two goats for sacrifice. (Leviticus 16:8)
• Lots were cast for the land inheritance of Israel’s tribes. (Joshua 18)
• The apostles cast lots for the man to replace Judas. (Acts 1:16-26)
• Sailors cast lots to discover who was responsible for a storm that endangered their lives. The lot fell to Jonah. (Jonah 1)

In the first three examples it is unclear whether God influenced the outcomes or left each outcome to chance. However, in the case of Jonah, God’s involvement is clear.

It could be argued that when no moral issues are involved and a choice is unclear, a flip of a coin might be wiser than voting or leaving a decision to a committee or other group within a congregation.

King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon was eager for wisdom in making decisions. He consulted His advisors but over time realized that these wise men were either using personal wisdom, relating speculation, or applying chance in their use of astrology, charms, divination, etc. They might as well have been casting lots.

We might be just as eager for wisdom in making decisions, but how can we be sure that God has given us His answer or influenced the outcome? How can we be sure that our eventual course is approved by God? Consider Proverbs 18:18...

The cast lot puts an end to strife

And decides between the mighty ones.

In the numerous passages about casting lots, it appears that God used this as a means of taking the decision out of the hands of men. Whether He caused a certain outcome or allowed chance is not always clear. And yet, it ended strife between people and ended potential anxiety in individuals.

In our day people often look for signs when making decisions. And yet, God does not promise angelic messages, signs in the sky or in dreams. Nor has He instructed us to cast lots. So, when making decisions, first consult God’s written wisdom, the Bible...and follow what you discover. Second, seek wise counsel from someone older and with more experience...and listen! When indecision lingers, you can be sure of two paths that are unwise:

• Praying but doing what you secretly know you want to do. (Read Jeremiah 42 as an example.)
• Praying for guidance and doing nothing when you can do something, and at the same time expecting the Lord to make something happen. (Remember the Parable of the Talents in Matthew 25:14-30.)

Finally, if ever a choice must be made and the options are equivalent, perhaps wisdom reaches for the ‘lots’ simply to remove human strife.

Mark Stinnett

July 5, 2026